Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18843 (KAR)

BIFR v. M/S NGEF LTD

CA/69/2026 · 2026-06-04

Jyoti M

Civil Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26375 CA No. 69 of 2026 In CA No. 184 of 2015 In COP No. 154 of 2002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 69 OF 2026 IN COMPANY APPLICATION NO.184 OF 2015 IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 154 OF 2002 BETWEEN: BIFR, 8TH FLOOR, JAWAHAR VYAPAR BHAVAN, 1, TOLSTOY MARG, NEW DELHI-110001. …APPLICANT (BY SRI. H.P.GANGESH GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR IMPLEADING APPLICANT) AND: M/S NGEF LTD., REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES, COMMERCE AND NODAL OFFICER, NGEF LTD., KHANIJA BHAVAN, BENGALURU-560001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SAJI P.JOHN, ADVOCATE) THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 1 RULE 10(2) READ WITH SECTION 151 OF C.P.C. AND READ WITH RULE 6 AND 9 OF THE COMPANY COURT RULES, 1959. THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26375 CA No. 69 of 2026 In CA No. 184 of 2015 In COP No. 154 of 2002 ORAL ORDER Sri.H.P.Gangesh Gowda., counsel for the impleading applicant has appeared in person. Sri.Saji.P.John., counsel has appeared in person and undertakes to file power on behalf of the respondent. Submission is noted. Office is directed to accept the vakalath filed by counsel Sri.Saji.P.John. After arguing the matter for sometime, counsel for the applicant submits that the application in C.A.No.69/2026 may be dismissed as not pressed. When queried, counsel for the applicant submits that a conscious decision is taken about the non-pressing of the application and if an order is passed the applicant shall not seek review of the order or modification of the order. The oral submission is placed on record. As the counsel on record has taken a conscious decision about the non-pressing of the application, the Company Application is dismissed as not pressed. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE MRP List No.:1 Sl No.:15