- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26124 WP No. 835 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA WRIT PETITION NO.835 OF 2023 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: MR BABA FAKRUDDIN S., S/O LATE S BABU AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/A NO.09, IST CROSS NANJAPPA GARDEN, NEXT TO GAGAN JYOTHI APARTMENT, MANJUNATHA LAYOUR, R T NAGAR, BENGALURU-560032. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HOSAMANI SHAKEEL AHMAD MEERANSAB, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: MRS NOOR MOHAMMAD NAZEEMA D/O MR NOOR MOHAMMAD RAFI, W/O MR BABA FAKRUDDIN S., AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/A NO.6/195, MUKUNDARI GADDA, RAJAMPET, KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-516115. …RESPONDENT (RESPONDENT IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) Digitally signed by AASEEFA PARVEEN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26124 WP No. 835 of 2023 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE II ADDITONAL FAMILY JUDGE AT BENGALURU VIDE ORDER DATED 29.11.2022 IN G AND WC NO.316/2022 ON IANO.4 UNDER SECTION 151 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE AS PER ANNEXURE-P,DIRECTING THE PETITIONER TO PRODUCE THE SAID CHILDREN WITH THEIR BIRTH CERTIFICATE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA ORAL ORDER No representation on petitioner's side on call. 2. In the forenoon session learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the writ petition has become infructuous, as the main case was disposed of by the family Court. However, when the matter is called at 3.50 p.m., there is no representation on petitioner's side. The case status obtained through website reveals that G&WC No.316/2022 was disposed on 20.12.2023. This writ petition is filed challenging the order rendered on IA No.IV which was filed seeking the Court to - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26124 WP No. 835 of 2023 dispense with the production of identity proof and residential status of the minor child. Thus, as the main case itself is disposed of, this Court is of the view that this writ petition does not survive for consideration. Therefore, writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE AP CT:TSM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 45