IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA COPC No. 1077/2026 Decided on: 17.08.2026 Anita Devi …..Petitioner Versus A. Shainamol & ors. ….Respondents ______________________________________________________________ Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Mamta Garg, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Baldev Singh Negi, Additional A.G. Romesh Verma, Judge (oral) The present petition has been filed alleging violation of order, dated 19.03.2026, as passed by this Court in CWP No. 3278/2026. 2 Learned Additional Advocate General for the respondents has placed on record copy of office order, dated 17.08.2026, whereby representation of the petitioner has been considered and rejected. 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 3 Faced with the situation, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks and is granted liberty to challenge the aforesaid office order before the competent Court of law. 4 In view of above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and the same is closed, however with liberty, as aforesaid. Notices are discharged. (Romesh Verma) 17.08.2026 Judge (pankaj)