IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 228 CRM-M-21890-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 22.05.2026 BALINDER SINGH ALIAS BIRENDER AND OTHERS ... Petitioners Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present : Mr. Lovish, Advocate for Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Amrik Narwal, DAG, Haryana. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Learned State counsel submits that the additional accused Nanhi Devi is not made party in the quashing petition as also victim Dikshit, in view of which, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to file a fresh with better particulars on the same cause of action, by impleading the aforesaid accused and victim, in case, there is a compromise arrived at with them. 2. Ordered accordingly. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) 22.05.2026 JUDGE ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No ASHOK KUMAR 2026.05.22 14:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document