APHC010127492026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 8095/2026 Between: 1. SRI SAL GITA MANDIR ABHIVRIDHI SANGAM,, KAMAYYA THOPU, KANUR VILLAGE, PENAMALURU MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, SMT. E. ANNAPURNAMMA. 2. SMT. E. ANNAPURNAMMA,, W/O. KOTESWARA RAO, AGED 75 YEARS, OCC. SECRETARY, SRI SAI GITA MANDIR ABHIVRIDHI SANGAM, R/O. SRI SATHYA SAI RESIDENCY, KAMAYYA THOPU, KANUR VILLAGE, PENAMALURU MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT), SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-522237. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, , KRISHNA DISTRICT NOW NTR DISTRICT AT VIJAYAWADA ANDHRA PRADESH-520001. 3. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, NTR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-521225. 4. THE COMMISSIONER, , PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, ANDHRA PRADESH, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-522501. 5. THE KANURU GRAM PANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, KANURU VILLAGE, PENAMALURU MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH- 520007. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the Respondent No. 2 in not 2 taking steps for the alienation of Ac.0.15 cents of land in Sy. No. 245/2 of Kanuru Village, Penamaluru Mandal, Krishna District, in favour of the Petitioner No. 1 Sangam, in obedience to the directions contained in G.O. Rt. No. 1500, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development (Pts. Ill) Department, dated 05.10.2010, and in the face of the final orders of this Honble Court in W.P. No. 25600 of 2010 dated 26.03.2013, W.P. No. 39312 of 2013 dated 18.04.2017 as illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional consequentially direct the Respondent No. 2 to immediately take all necessary steps to implement G.O. Rt. No. 1500 dated 05.10.2010, by executing a deed of alienation/conveyance in respect of the said Ac.0.15 cents of land in favour of the Petitioner No. 1 Sangam within a time frame stipulated by this Hon'ble Court by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 14.01.2026 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 2 to immediately take all necessary steps to implement G.O. Rt. No. 1500 dated 05.10.2010, by executing a deed of alienation/conveyance in respect of the said Ac.0.15 cents of land in favour of the Petitioner No. 1 Sangam within a time frame stipulated by this Hon'ble Court by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 14.01.2026 pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V SAI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ::ORDER:: Heard Sri V.Sai Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Chaitanya, learned counsel representing Sri Y.Koteswara Rao, learned Standing counsel for the Gram Panchayat. 3 2. The above writ petition was filed to declare the action of the 2nd respondent in not taking steps for the alienation of Ac.0.15 cents in Sy.No.245/2 of Kanuru Village, Penamaluru Mandal, Krishna District, in favour of the petitioner, as illegal and arbitrary. 3. Today when the matter is taken up, Sri Chaitanya, learned counsel representing Sri Y.Koteswara Rao, learned Standing counsel for the Gram Panchayat, would submit that the Kanuru Gram Panchayat is merged with YSR Tadigadapa Municipality. 4. Sri V.Sai Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to file a fresh petition. 5. Permission is accorded. 6. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to file a fresh petition. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in this case, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Dated: 30.03.2026 SNI 4 1 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.8095 OF 2026 Dated: 30.03.2026 SNI