PROTIUM FINANCE LIMITED v. ADD. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, BARUIPUR-I, SOUTH 24 PARGANAS AND ORS.
WPA/1336/2026 · 2026-01-29
Reetobroto Kumar Mitra
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18830 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18830 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
29/01 2026
AD-03/24 266312 NANDY
(ED-DO)
In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side
WPA 1336 of 2026
PROTIUM FINANCE LIMITED Vs.
ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE-I, BARUIPUR & ORS.
Ms. Anukriti Podder, Advocate Ms. Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocate …...for the Petitioner
1. Affidavit of service, as filed, be kept with the record.
2. In spite of service, there is no representation on behalf of the respondents.
3. The petitioner, a Financial Corporation had filed an application under Section 14 of The Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest (SARFAESI) Act, 2002 on 16.10.2025 before the respondent no. 1, which is pending for almost six months now.
4. In spite of a statutory mandate to dispose of such application within a period of 30 days, the same has not been disposed of as yet.
5. The respondent no. 1 is directed to dispose of the application made by the petitioner under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act by 20.02.2026.
6. With this direction, WPA 1336 of 2026 is disposed of. No order as to costs.
(Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)
P a g e | 2