Cineline Entertainment Pvt Ltd v. KRISHNA FAMILY PRIVATE TRUST
CHOL/507/2026 · 2026-10-01
Original Suitbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18823 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18823 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Chamber Order No. 507/2026 in Suit (L) No. 34692/2025 Perused Praecipe dated 14.10.2026 submitted by ld. Advocate for the plaintiff and contents mentioned therein. Ld. Advocate for the plaintiff submits that office obejctions were complied with and uploaded on 07.10.2026. However, C-filing department rejected compliance on the ground that twice files were uploaded. Ld. Advocate tenders print out of uploaded documents, which shows that only one file was uploaded. Looking to the factual position, it appears that due to technical glitch, office rejected compliace done by the plaintiff. Therefore, it is necessary to restore captioned Suit to its original file and grant further time to the plaintiff for necessary compliance. In view thereof, in the interest of justice, Suit (L) No. 34692/2025 is restored to file. Office is directed to take follow up action. Thus, time granted to the petitioner to remove office objections of Petition, if any, and get the same registered and/or numbered by uploading/filing compliance praecipe, is extended till 21.10.2026, failing Suit to stand rejected for non-compliance of office objections under O.S.Rule
986. Date : 14.10.2026 Prothonotary and Senior Master