KULDEEP SINGH AND ANOTHER v. NIPUN JINDAL AND ANOTHER
COPC/1064/2026 · 2026-08-07
Romesh Verma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18820 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18820 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:HHC:33455 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
COPC No. 1064/2026
Decided on: 07.08.2026
Kuldeep Singh & anr.
…..Petitioners
Versus
Nipun Jindal & anr.
….Respondents ______________________________________________________________
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Virender Singh Kanwar, Advocate.
Romesh Verma, Judge (oral)
The present petition has been filed alleging violation of order, dated 03.03.2026, as passed by this Court in CWP No. 2238/2026. 2
Learned counsel for the respondents has placed on record copies of office orders, dated 05.06.2026 & 06.06.2026, whereby amount of DCRG and leave encashment stand released in favour of the petitioners.
1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
2
3
Though, learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, has acknowledged the aforesaid fact, however he has contended that interest accrued on the aforesaid amount has not been paid to the petitioners. 4
Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the respondents, on instructions, has submitted that needful shall be done within a period of twelve weeks from today. His statement is taken on record. 5
In view of above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and the same is closed. Notices are discharged.
(Romesh Verma) 07.08.2026
Judge (pankaj)