1 2026:CGHC:23120 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 489 of 2026 • Snehlata Gupta @ Babli D/o Late Raghuraj Prasad Aged About 48 Years R/o Krishan Nagar Ward Juna Bilaspur (Baniyapara) Bilaspur Tehsil And District Bilaspur Civil And Revenue District Bilaspur C.G. ... Applicant versus 1. Hitesh Gupta @ Lucky Gupta S/o Late Narendra Kumar Gupta Aged About 32 Years Respondent No. 1 And 2 R/o Village Gudi (Seepat) Tehsil Masture, Sub Tehsil Seepat District Bilaspur C.G. 2. Saurabh Gupta And Sonal Gupta S/o Late Narendra Kumar Gupta Aged About 26 Years Respondent No. 1 And 2 R/o Village Gudi (Seepat) Tehsil Masture, Sub Tehsil Seepat District Bilaspur C.G. 3. Sadeepa Gupta @ Reena Gupta D/o Late Narendra Kumar Gupta Granddaughter Of Late Raghuraj Prasas Sao ,w/o Shri Aditya Gupta , Aged About 30 Years R/o Dipka Tehsil And District Korba C.G. 4. Deleted Nil 5. Rajendra Prasad Sao, S/o Late Raghuraj Prasad Sao Aged About 59 Years Respondent No, 5 And 6 R/o Krishan Nagar Ward Juna Bilaspur (Baniyapara) Bilaspur Tehsil And District Bilaspur C.G. 6. Ramakant Gupra S/o Late Raghuraj Prasad Sao Aged About 50 Years Respondent No, 5 And 6 R/o Krishan Nagar Ward Juna Bilaspur (Baniyapara) Bilaspur Tehsil And District Bilaspur C.G. 7. Smt, Gayatri Gupta W/o Shri Ashok Gupta D/o Late Raghuraj Prasad Sao, Aged About 57 Years R/o -Juna Bilaspur City, Tehsil And District Bilaspur C.G. 8. Smt, Pushplata Gupta Wd/o Late Rajendra Prasad Gupta Aged About 60 Years D/o Late Raghuraj Prasad Sao, R/o Baniyapara Aarang District Raipur C.G. 9. Smt, Kumund Rani Guru Goswami W/o Shri Kailash Saheb Guru Goswami Aged About 52 Years D/o Late Raghuraj Prasad Sao, R/o Shukrawari Bazar Gudhiyari District Raripur C.G. ... Non-Applicant(s) SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2026.05.15 14:15:47 +0530 2 For Applicant : Mr. Shyam Kumar, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 15.05 .2026 1. Heard an application for restoration of CR No. 100 of 2016. 2. In CR No. 100 of 2016 vide order dated 23.03.2026, the applicant was granted one week time to rectify the default, but applicant failed to rectify default, therefore, Civil Revision was dismissed on account of peremptory order. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that further 7 days’ time may be granted to the applicant to comply with the order dated 23.03.2026 passed in CR No. 100 of 2016. He would submit that the applicant has good case on merits. 4. Heard. 5. Having considered submission advanced by Mr. Shyam Kumar and reasons assigned in the application, MCC is hereby allowed. The CR No. 100 of 2016 is restored to its original number subject to payment of cost of Rs. 1000/- payable to Library Fund, High Court Bar Association, Bilaspur. The applicant is granted 7 days time to rectify the default pointed out by the Registry. 6. Accordingly, the instant MCC is hereby disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE $iddhant