Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18818 (AP)

MD LAL AHMED, VIZIANAGARAM DIST v. MANDAVA SUBASH CHANDRA BOSE, HYDERABAD & 5 OTHERS

CRP/1196/2017 · 2026-03-10

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010127732017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] WEDNESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1196/2017 Between: 1. MD LAL AHMED, VIZIANAGARAM DIST, S/O. M.A.ALISHA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O. LIDIKAVALASA, GOCHAKKA POST, PARVATIPURAM MANDAL, VIZIANGARAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. MANDAVA SUBASH CHANDRA BOSE HYDERABAD 5 OTHERS, S/ O. BHASKARA RAO, HINDU; AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.8- 2-824, SANTHOSH NAGAR, MEHDIPATNAM, HYDERABAD. 2. MANDAVA ARUNA, W/O. SUBASH CHANDRA BOSE, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.8-2-824, SANTHOSH NAGAR, MEHDIPATNAM, HYDERABAD. 3. MANDAVA ANISHA, D/O. SUBASH CHANDRA BOSE, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.8-2-824, SANTHOSH NAGAR, MEHDIPATNAM, HYDERABAD. 4. MANDAVA ANIL, S/O. SUBASH CHANDRA BOSE, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.8-2-824, SANTHOSH NAGAR, MEHDIPATNAM, HYDERABAD. 5. NAGARAJU, S/O. NOT KNOWN, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/O. LIDIKIVALASA (V), GOCHAKKA PANCHAYAT, PARVATIPURAM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT 6. T SRINATH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, ACCOUNTANT IN M/S. LAKSHMI BALAJI OILS, OFFICE AT KMH ROAD, PARVATIPURAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toagainst the Decree and Order dated 04.04.2016 passed in I.A.No.109/2016 in A.T.C.No.1/2013, on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Parvatipuram, IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRPMP 1604 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to fix a early date for hearig the above CRP and pass IA NO: 3 OF 2017(CRPMP 5872 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S SRIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VENKATESWARA RAO GUDAPATI The court made the following ORDER:- The instant civil revision petition has been filed by the revision petitioner, challenging the decree and order dated 04.04.2016 passed in I.A.No.109 of 2016 in A.T.C.No.1 of 2013 on the file of Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Parvatipuram. 2. When the matter is called, there is no representation for the petitioner. 3. On the other side, Sri S. Manasvi, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 & 2, submits that the matter is settled between the parties out of the Court. 4. Recording the above submission that the matter is settled out of the Court, the revision petition is closed. 3 5. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 11.03.2026 GVK 4 62 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1196 of 2017 Date: 11.03.2026 GVK