Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18812 (AP)

M.Venkatrathnam S/o.Late M.Subbaraya Setty v. Tirupati Municipal Corporation

WP/718/2014 · 2026-03-09

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010126202014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 718/2014 Between: 1. M.VENKATRATHNAM S/O.LATE M.SUBBARAYA SETTY,, R/O.D.NO.14/180, PADMAVATHIPURAM, TIRUPATI,TIRUPATI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. TIRUPATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. TIRUPATI URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, , REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A P REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. POTHAM VENGALA REDDY SC FOR M.CORPORATION IN RAYALASEEMA REGION 2. Karri kalyan Durga Prasad SC FOR TUDA The Court made the following: 2 ORAL ORDER: Sri N.C. John Paul, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri A. Purushotham Reddy, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, on instructions, submits that this Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2. Having so recorded, this Writ Petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. 3. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:10.03.2026 Vns