YUVRAJ SINGH S/O LAXMAN SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/5388/2026 · 2026-04-09
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1881 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1881 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:14843] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5388/2026 Yuvraj Singh S/o Laxman Singh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Dhapda, Police Station Kareda, District Bhilwara. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail, Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jiya UR Rahman For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 09/04/2026
1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.353/2025 registered at Police Station Jawaja, District Beawar for offences under Sections 189(2), 191(2), 190, 324(4), 325, 326(g), 125, 333 and 351(3) of BNS,
2023.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The allegations against the present petitioner is that the petitioner along with other co- accused came with deadly weapons and pelted stones as well as set the house of the complainant on fire. He further submits that both the parties belong to the same village. The name of the present petitioner has not been mentioned in the FIR. The name
[2026:RJ-JP:14843] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5388/2026] of the petitioner has surfaced only on the basis of the statement of the complainant/witness. There is no specific injury attributed to the petitioner. Co-accused-Bablu Singh, Babu Singh, Sachin Singh and Anil Singh @ Pintu have been enlarged on bail by this Court on 05.03.2026. Petitioner is behind the bars since 12.03.2026 without any criminal past. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submissions made by
learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Yuvraj Singh S/o Laxman Singh, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/38