Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1881 (ALL)

RAM PRAKASH SEXENA v. HOME GUARD DHARMPAL AND 3 OTHERS

CAPL/3050/2026 · 2026-05-06

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3050 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. Father of the applicant, Net Ram, had filed Writ Petition No. 9808 of 1985 in which an interim order was granted that petitioner shall not be evicted from the land in dispute if he has not already been evicted. 2. According to applicant, opposite parties are trying to dispossess the applicant from the property in dispute. 3. Persons who have been arrayed as contemnors are not party in the writ petition. 4. No case for contempt is made out. 5. The contempt application is misconceived and stands dismissed. 6. However, leaving it open to the applicant to file impleadment application before writ Court and get the opposite parties impleaded. May 7, 2026 (V. S. SINGH) Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Abhishek Mishra, Ram Prakash Ram Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Ram Prakash Sexena .....Applicant(s) Home Guard Dharmpal And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad