Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:19555 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No. 281 of 2026
------
1. Rishi Dev @ Deo Yadav, aged about 68 years, son of Parsuram Yadav, resident of Badka Gaw Road, Imli Kothi, P.O. –Hazaribag, P.S. –Sadar Hazaribag, District – Hazaribag (Jharkhand).
2. Umesh Kumar Yadav, aged about 45 years, Son of Shiv Narayan Prasad Yadav, Resident of Bada Bazar, Gowal Toli, P.O. –Bada Bazar, P.S. –Sadar, Hazaribagh, District – Hazaribagh, (Jharkhand).
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Smt. Uma Choudhary, W/o Lt. Awadh Bihari Choudhary, R/o –Road No.1, Ajanta Colony, Rajiv Nagar, P.O.+P.S. – Keshri Nagar, Patna, Bihar. .... .... .... Opp. Parties
------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner s : Mr. Nitish Parth Sarthi, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Addl. P.P.
For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Shivam Pratap Singh, Advocate
------
Order No.04 Dated- 03.07.2026
Heard the parties.
This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed at the instance of the petitioners for restoration of Cr.M.P. No.2102 of 2023 to its original file.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that Cr.M.P. No.2102 of 2023 was dismissed for non-prosecution. It is next submitted that due to inadvertence and bonafide mistake on the part of the office clerk of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the said Cr.M.P. No.2102 of 2023 could not be marked in the cause list, hence the learned counsel for the petitioners could not appear before the Court when the case was called out, resulting in dismissal of the same. It is then submitted that the non- appearance of the learned counsel for the petitioners was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is next submitted that the petitioners have very good grounds to agitate in the said Cr.M.P. No.2102 of 2023 and unless Cr.M.P. No.2102 of 2023 is restored to its original
file, the petitioners will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that Cr.M.P. No.2102 of 2023 be restored to its original file.
Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, Cr.M.P. No.2102 of 2023 is restored to its original file to the stage at which, it was before its dismissal.
List Cr.M.P. No.2102 of 2023 under the appropriate heading after a week before the appropriate Bench.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
03.07.2026 Sonu-