Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26042 CRL.P No. 5250 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5250 OF 2019 BETWEEN:
1.
SRI A B MALLESHAPPA, S/O BALEMARADA BHARMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
2.
SMT VISHALAKSHAMMA, W/O A B MALLESHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
BOTH ARE RESIDENT OF
"SHIVASRAYA NILAYA" VIDYANAGAR, A - BLOCK, HARIHAR, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT - 577 601.
3.
REKHA GAJAPURA, W/O RENUKAIAH @ RENUKASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O HAIHESWARA TEMPLE ROAD, HAVALADA BEEDI, 2ND CROSS, HARIHAR, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT - 577 601.
…PETITIONERS (BY SRI S.B. HALLI, ADVOCATE) AND:
SMT. JYOTHI, W/O B M VISHWANTH, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/O DASARAKALLAHALLI,
Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26042 CRL.P No. 5250 of 2019
HOLEHONNUR HOBLI, BHADRAVATHI TQ -577 227.
…RESPONDENT (BY SRI UMESH MOOLIMANI, ADVOCATE FOR SRI S.V. PRAKASH, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS INITIATED AGAINST THE PETITIONERS IN C.C.NO.296/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE 1ST ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BHADRAVATHI FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 319,321,494,497 AND 504 R/W 34 OF IPC, IN SO FOR THE PETITIONERS IS CONCERNED.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
ORAL ORDER
This criminal petition was filed challenging proceedings in CC.no.296/2014 on file of I Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Bhadravathi for offences punishable under Sections 319, 321, 494, 497, 504 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 ('IPC').
2. It was submitted that during pendency of above petition, matter before trial Court is disposed of on 03.08.2022.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26042 CRL.P No. 5250 of 2019
Copy of case status in CC.no.296/2014 is produced along with memo dated 02.06.2026.
3.
Learned counsel for respondent does not dispute submission and stated that he has no instructions of whether said order has been challenged/recalled.
4. In view of above, petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
GRD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27