1 2026:CGHC:22460 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 809 of 2016 1 - Smt. Sandhya Jain D/o Late Shri Phool Chand Sethiya Aged About 59 Years R/o 10, Near J.J. Nursing Home, Malviya Nagar, Police Station-Mohan Nagar, Durg, District-Durg, Chhattisgarh 2 - Smt. Kalpana Karnawat, W/o Late Shri Suresh Karnawat. Aged About 57 Years R/o 10, Near J.J. Nursing Home, Malviya Nagar, Police Station-Mohan Nagar, Durg, District-Durg, Chhattisgarh 3 - Smt Pushpa Jain, W/o Shri Rajesh Kumar Jain Aged About 52 Years R/o 10, Near J.J. Nursing Home, Malviya Nagar, Police Station-Mohan Nagar, Durg, District-Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Applicants versus 1 - Thakur Ram Singh The Then Collector, District Raipur Chhattisgarh Presently Working As Chief Election Commissioner, Raipur Chhattisgarh., Chhattisgarh 2 - Mahadev Karve, Additional Collector And C.E.O. Raipur Development Authority, Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Deepak Kumar Agrawal, The Then Upper Collector, Office Of The Development Commissioner, Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Suresh Kumar Agrawal, The Then S D O Revenue, Raipur, Presently Working As Transport Officer, R.T.O. Raipur Chhattisgarh. , District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Jageshwar Kaushal, The Then Additional Tehsildar-Raipur, Presently Working As Tahsildar Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh Digitally signed by AMIT PATEL 2 6 - Neelkanth Verma, Patwari Halka No. 114/52, Deopuri, Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 7 - Superintendent Of Police, Anti Corruption Bureau And E O W, Raipur Chhattisagarh. , District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Applicants : None present. For Respondent No.3 : Mr. Chandresh Shrivastava along with Ms. Mahi Pandey, Advocates. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Smt Justice Rajani Dubey Order on Board 13.05.2026 1. When the matter was listed on 17.11.2025, 08.01.2026, 20.01.2026 and 02.03.2026, no one appeared on behalf of the applicants. Today also when the matter is called for hearing, no one appears on behalf of the applicants, nor any representation is made on their behalf. 2. It transpires from the record that the applicants have no interest in pursuing the matter due to efflux of time. 3. The revision is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Rajani Dubey) JUDGE AMIT PATEL