( 2026:JHHC:19485 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 577 of 2026 ------ Mangal Deo Oraon, aged about 30 years, son of Lode Oraon, r/o Village-Ambajharam, P.O.-Murup, P.S.-Latehar, Dist.- Latehar … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Kumar Nishant, Advocate For the State : Mr. Fahad Allam, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.05 Dated- 03.07.2026 I.A. No.6274 of 2026 Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this interlocutory application has been filed with the prayer to delete the name of the petitioner no.1- Manoj Oraon @ Manoj Kumar Minz from the cause title of this criminal miscellaneous petition as already the petitioner no.1 has fulfilled the terms and conditions made in A.B.A. No. 114 of 2025 dated 17.01.2025. Considering the facts of the case, the prayer is allowed. Registry is directed to delete the name and particulars of the petitioner no. 1 from the array of the petitioners and renumber the petitioner no. 2 as the sole petitioner in the cause title of this criminal miscellaneous petition with red ink. This interlocutory application is disposed of accordingly. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Cr.M.P. No. 577 of 2026 Heard the parties. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed at the instance of the petitioner for restoration of Cr.M.P. No. 2778 of 2025 to its original file. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Cr.M.P. No. 2778 of 2025 was dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory order of filing supplementary affidavit. It is next submitted that due to inadvertence, the said supplementary affidavit could not be filed within the stipulated time and the same resulted in dismissal of Cr.M.P. No. 2778 of 2025. It is next submitted that the petitioner had already deposited Rs.10,000/- as cash security in the court below concerned. It is further submitted that non-compliance of the peremptory order was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is next submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said Cr.M.P. No. 2778 of 2025 and unless Cr.M.P. No. 2778 of 2025 is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that Cr.M.P. No. 2778 of 2025 be restored to its original file. Considering the facts of this case and the submission on behalf of of the petitioner, Cr.M.P. No. 2778 of 2025 is restored to its original file to the stage at which, it was before its dismissal. List Cr.M.P. No. 2778 of 2025 under the appropriate heading before the appropriate bench after a week. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 03.07.2026 Gunjan-