Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18803 (CHH)

DR. KAMLESH JAISWAL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/2692/2020 · 2026-05-14

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:23187 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2692 of 2020 Dr. Kamlesh Jaiswal S/o Late Shri Basant Lal Jaiswal Aged About 34 Years Present R/o Block D 3, Sai Complex , Near Sai Mandir, Sai Nagar Raipur , District Raipur Chhattisgarh, Permanent R/o Village And Post Ramnagar, Tahsil And District Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Health And Family Welfare Department , Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur , District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Medical Education, Nawa Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Dean Pt. J.N.M. Medical College Raipur , District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioners : Mr. Devesh G Kela, Advocate For Respondents : Dr. SK Dewangan, Panel Lawyer ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 15 . 05 .202 6 1. Heard. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for grant of payment of stipend, the petitioner has made representation to the respondent No.02 i.e. Director, Medical Education, but same has not been considered and decided till date. SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN 2 3. Be that as it may, the respondent No.02 is directed to consider and decide petitioner’s said representation within 60 days’ from today in accordance with law by passing reasoned and speaking order. Petitioner is also at liberty to file additional representation alongwith additional material for redressal of his grievance. 4. With aforesaid observation, liberty and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant petition stands finally disposed off. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge s@if