2026:HHC:34447 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.2138 of 2015 Decided on: 14.08.2026 __________________________________________________________ Sant Ram .....Petitioner Versus The Financial Commissioner ....Respondents (Appeals) Shimla and others Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Naveen Kumar Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the respondents: None for respondent No.1, though represented. Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.2 and 3- State. Mr. Khem Raj, Advocate vice Mr. Sanjay Jaswal, Advocate, for respondent No.4. Ranjan Sharma, Judge Instant petition was filed through Special Power of Attorney, Shri Manoj Kumar, from whom no Instructions are forth-coming. Even the Original Petitioner-Sant Ram is also stated to have expired on 26.09.2024. 2. In these circumstances, the instant petition 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:34447 is closed for want of prosecution. 3. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge August 14, 2026 [Bhardwaj]