[2026:RJ-JP:12950] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3615/2026 Mangilal S/o Ramlal, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Kuka, Police Station Bagoda, District Jalore, At Present R/o 144 Village Badheri, Sector 41D Chandigarh, Police Station Sector 41D District Chandigarh. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Sambhar Lake). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3917/2026 Raju Bairwa S/o Badrilal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Ajapur, Police Station Shyopur Dehat, District Shyopur, Madhya Pradesh. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Dudu, District Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4313/2026 Bhawraram Urf Pintu Jat S/o Jetharam Jat, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Labhu Ka Talla Khadin, Police Station Ramsar, District Barmer, Rajasthan. (Petitioner Is Confined In Sambhar Lake, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Ratnawat Mr. Shafiq-ur-Rahman Ms. Saroj Jat Mr. Rakesh Chandel for Mr. Dinesh Pareek For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 27/03/2026 1. These bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.22/2025 registered at Police Station Mokhampura, District Jaipur Rural for offence punishable under Section 19/54 of Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950. [2026:RJ-JP:12950] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3615/2026] 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that co-accused, who was apprehended at the spot, has been granted benefit of bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. It is contended that no recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioners. It is submitted that petitioners are in custody since 12.02.2026 & 13.02.2026, respectively and further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioners. He submits that three other cases have been registered against the petitioner- Mangilal and two other cases have been registered against the petitioner- Bhawraram. 4. Heard. Perused the material available on record. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, and the fact that co-accused, who was found in possession of illicit liquor, has been granted benefit of bail by Co- ordinate Bench of this Court and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of this case, I deem it proper to allow these bail applications. 6. These bail applications are accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners – 1. Mangilal S/o Ramlal, 2. Raju Bairwa S/o Badrilal, and 3. Bhawraram Urf Pintu Jat S/o Jetharam Jat, shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- [2026:RJ-JP:12950] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3615/2026] (Rupees One Lakh Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail. Further, petitioner- Mangilal and petitioner- Bhawraram Urf Pintu Jat shall mark their presence in the first week of every month in the concerned police station, till trial is concluded. 8. Concerned SHO shall enter attendance of the aforesaid petitioners in the Roznamcha. In case the petitioners fail to mark their presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to them by this Court. 10. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance. 11. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of these bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /50-51 & 53