Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18789 (BOM)

BHAUSAHEB S/O. PANDHARINATH UNDRE AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

REVN/280/2019 · 2026-10-07

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 927-REVN-280-2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 927 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 280 OF 2019 Bhausaheb S-o. Pandharinath Undre And Others VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Ms. A. S. Kharade, h/f., Mr. R. R. Karpe, Advocate for Applicant. Mrs. B. B. Gunjal, APP for Respondent – State. Mr. Z. M. Pathan, Advocate for Respondent No.2. ... CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. DATE : 07 OCTOBER, 2026 PC: 1. In pursuance of the dispute between the parties, the learned counsel for the parties jointly state that the applicants have compromised the matter with respondent No.2. Accordingly, they have tendered a copy of joint settlement application on behalf of the applicant-accused and the respondent No.2 for taking the compromise/settlement on record and for granting the relief. Accordingly the said settlement application is taken on record and marked “X” for the purpose of identification. 2. Perusal of paragraph 7 of the instant Application discloses that respondent No.2 has consented to resolve the dispute. It is pointed out to this Court that there are three victims who were injured in the incident. Out of them, one Shri. Datta Maruti Gore expired on 23 July 2026. Kiran Kawre 2 / 2 927-REVN-280-2019 However, the remaining two victims have also singed the settlement application and also extended their consent for granting relief to the applicants. 3. In that view of the matter, since the settlement between the parties has taken place and the applicants have been convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 325, 324, 323, 504 and 506 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 37(1) read with Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act, the instant Criminal Revision Application is allowed. Accordingly, the conviction and sentence imposed upon the applicants by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Newasa, in TRC No.62 of 2006, by judgment and order dated 10 July 2014, and as modified by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Newasa, in Criminal Appeal No.12 of 2015, are hereby quashed and set aside. The applicants are acquitted in Crime No. 40 of 2006 registered with Newasa Police Station, and bail bonds are cancelled. Fine amount deposited, if any, be refunded to Accused. 4. The Criminal Revision Application is disposed of accordingly. (SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.) Kiran Kawre