1 (RNT,J &MRK,J CMA. NO.584 OF 2009) APHC010122842009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3524] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 584/2009 Between: 1. MOTHA BHARATHI DEVI, W/O. RAMAKRISHNA SENIOR CLERK IN COMMERCIAL TAX DEPOT R/O. SAMALKOT,KDMC, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND 1. MOTHA RAMAKRISHNA, S/o. Gopal Rao, Typist cum Clerk, State Bank of Hyderabad, Aakiveedu,Eluru DMC, West Godavari District. ...RESPONDENT Appeal Under Section_____against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2009(CMAMP 1063 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispose of the above appeal expeditiously by fixing an early date in the interest of justice, as otherwise, i will be put to irreparable loss and hardship IA NO: 1 OF 2010(CMAMP 1694 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to ecpedite the hearing o main CMA No. 8584 of 2009 in the interest of justice Counsel for the Appellant: 2 (RNT,J &MRK,J CMA. NO.584 OF 2009) 1. D SESHADRI NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent: 1. VENKAT CHALLA The Court made the following: 3 (RNT,J &MRK,J CMA. NO.584 OF 2009) JUDGMENT:-(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) This appeal has been filed by the appellant/wife being aggrieved from the dismissal of her petition filed under Sections 13(1)(ia) and (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act,1955, seeking decree of divorce, vide judgment and decree dated 31.03.2009 passed in O.P.No.101 of 2007 on the file of the III Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada. 2. On 24.02.2025 the following order was passed : <Sri N.Manikanta, learned counsel, appears and submits that he has instructions to appear in this case on behalf of the appellant and prays for time to file vakalat. 2. Post after two weeks in the weekly cause list.= 3. The counsel whose name is reflected in the order dated 24.02.2025 has not filed any vakalat in the present proceedings. No vakalat has also been filed by any other counsel on behalf of the appellant. 4. Today also, there is no representation for the appellant, even in the revised call. 5. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J _____________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM,J Date : 28.01.2026. RPD. 4 (RNT,J &MRK,J CMA. NO.584 OF 2009) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM (DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION) CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 584 OF 2009 Date: 28.01.2026 RPD.