Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18784 (JHR)

HUSBAND OF VICTIM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5732/2026 · 2026-07-03

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:19524 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5732 of 2026 Husband of Victim … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Kumar Harsh, Advocate For the Opp. Party-State : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Spl. P.P. --- 04/03.07.2026 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 14.02.2026 in connection with Bagodar P.S. Case No. 30 of 2026, for the alleged offence registered under Sections 126 (2), 115, 109, 351(2), 3(5) of the BNS 2023 and under Section 66E of the I.T. Act pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II- cum-Special Judge (Cyber Crime) Giridih. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the bail application of the petitioner was earlier withdrawn in B.A. No. 3285 of 2026 vide order dated 20.04.2026. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that charge sheet has been submitted. The petitioner happens to be the husband of the victim and it is alleged that the petitioner has sent certain the obscene video of the victim to her brothers. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer for bail and as submitted that as per the impugned order the obscene video has been circulated to her brothers to humiliate her. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the charge sheet has already been submitted, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the 2026:JHHC:19524 2 like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge (Cyber Crime), Giridih in connection with Bagodar P.S. Case No. 30 of 2026 on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 6. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 7. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘FAX/E-mail’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 03.07.2026 Rakesh/- Uploaded on:-04.07.2026