1 2026:CGHC:20782 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1788 of 2026 Rishabh Kushwaha S/o Late Ashok Kushwaha Aged About 29 Years Presently Posted As Assistant Grade-Iii At District Treasurer, Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Finance, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Atal Nagar, P S And P O Rakhi, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Director Directorate Of Treasurer, Account And Pension, Block-A, First Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Regional Joint Director Treasurer, Account And Pension, Surguja Region, Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Senior Treasury Officer Block Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Waquar Naiyer, Advocate For Respondents : Ms. Sakshi Bajpai, Panel lawyer 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 04.05.2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the issue involved in this petition has been decided in a writ petition bearing WPS No. 1082 of 2023 vide order dated 31.01.2026 and the writ petition filed by petitioner therein has been dismissed. 2. Learned counsel for State also submits that the case of petitioner is covered with above mentioned writ petition. 3. This Court while disposing of the writ petition bearing WPS No. 1082 of 2023 on 31.01.2026 has observed as under:- “7. From a bare perusal of the record, it is quite vivid that he petitioner was appointed on compassionate ground to a Class-III post, subject to the condition that he obtain a one year Diploma/Certificate in Data Entry Operator and pass a Hindi Typing Test with a speed of 5000 key depression per hour on the computer. Passing this skill test constituted a condition computer. Passing this skill test constituted a condition precedent which the petitioner failed to fulfill within the prescribed period. As the petitioner cleared the skill test only on 09.12.2021, he has rightly been considered for regularization and other consequential benefits w.e.f. 13.12.2021. 8. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the opinion of this Court, the contention of the petitioner that he should have been granted benefits from the initial date of appointment is without merit and cannot be accepted. The grievance raised by the petitioner, therefore, could not be redressed. The respondents have rightly granted regularization and other service benefits with effect from 13.12.2021 which in view of this Court, is correct and does not call for any interference.” 3 4. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for petitioner, this writ petition is also dismissed in terms of order passed in WPS No. 1082 of 2023. Certified copy as per rules. sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge alfiza ALFIZA BAIG Digitally signed by ALFIZA BAIG Date: 2026.05.08 10:56:39 +0530