IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 289 CRM-M-13323-2026 Date of decision : 17.04.2026 SATPAL @SATYA PAL ...... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ...... RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present : Mr. Ravi Kant Berwal, Advocate for Mr. Baljeet Beniwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikram Singh, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Ajay Chauhan, Advocate for the complainant. ***** SURYA PARTAP SINGH . J.(Oral) 1. This petition for pre-arrest bail is the first petition filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of ‘the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023’. It has been filed with regard to a case arising out of FIR No.244 dated 16.09.2025, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 109(1), 190, 191(3), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 351(3) & 238 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Mundkati, District Palwal. 2. Vide order dated 11.03.2026, the petitioner was admitted to interim anticipatory bail, subject to the condition of furnishing bail/surety VIPIN KUMAR 2026.04.17 20:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-13323-2026 2 bonds to the satisfaction of arresting officer. It was also directed that the petitioner shall join the investigation. 3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in compliance with order dated 11.03.2026, the petitioner has joined the investigation. 4. The learned State Counsel has submitted that the petitioner has joined the investigation, and that for further investigation of this case his custodial interrogation is not required. 5. Keeping in view the aforesaid submissions and the fact that the petitioner has already joined the investigation, the order dated 11.03.2026, granting interim anticipatory bail to him, is hereby made absolute. The present petition stands allowed, accordingly. (SURYA PARTAP SINGH) JUDGE 17.04.2026 vipin Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether Reportable : No VIPIN KUMAR 2026.04.17 20:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document