2026:JHHC:19527 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5820 of 2026 Dilbar Shahi @ Dilwar Shahi, aged about 21 years, S/o Sayumuddin Ansari … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate For the Opp. Party-State : Mr. Abhay Kumar Tiwari, Advocate --- 03/03.07.2026 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 23.08.2025 in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No. 116 of 2025, Cyber Crime Case No. 146 of 2025, for the alleged offence registered under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2) of BNS, 2023 and under Section 66B, 66C, 66D and 84(C) of the I.T. Act pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge- II cum Special Judge Cyber Crime Court, Deoghar. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the bail application of the petitioner was rejected earlier in B.A. No. 9791 of 2025 vide order dated 24.03.2026. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 23.08.2025 and the charge has been framed on 03.01.2026. He has also submitted that the petitioner having no criminal antecedent and one victim has been identified and one mobile with two sims and one laptop are alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. He has also submitted that several co-accused persons have been enlarged on bail. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party- State has opposed the prayer for bail. However, the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is not in dispute. 2026:JHHC:19527 2 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the custody of the petitioner and that the charge having already been framed and that the petitioner has stated in paragraph 22 of the bail application that the petitioner having no criminal antecedent, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge Cyber Crime Court, Deoghar in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No. 116 of 2025, Cyber Crime Case No. 146 of 2025 on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 6. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 7. The learned trial court shall call for the criminal antecedent of report of the petitioner and, if any antecedent is found, he shall not be enlarged on bail. 8. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘FAX/E-mail’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 03.07.2026 Rakesh/- Uploaded on:-04.07.2026