MOHAMMAD SALIM @ DHOLU S/O MUMTAJ ALI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/11264/2025 · 2026-01-28
Ganesh Ram Meena
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18775 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18775 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:3859] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11264/2025 Mohammad Salim @ Dholu S/o Mumtaj Ali, Aged About 35 Years, R/o 190, Near Topkhana, Village Sultana, District Jhunjhunu, Raj. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 28/01/2026
1. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the accused- petitioner even in the second round. Earlier also on 24.11.2025, when the case was listed before the Court for hearing, no one was present on behalf of the accused-petitioner.
2. The petitioner has filed this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.316/2025 registered with the Police Station Shyam Nagar, District Jaipur City(South) for offence under Sections 308(2), 351(2), 351(3) and 324(4) of B.N.S., 2023.
3. Considered the submissions made by the learned Public Prosecutor and perused the contents of the First Information Report and so also the order passed by the learned Court Below.
4. Taking into consideration the nature of allegation
[2026:RJ-JP:3859] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-11264/2025] levelled against the accused-petitioner in the F.I.R. and so also the fact that there are nine other criminal cases pending against him, this Court feels that the accused-petitioner does not deserve any concession of anticipatory bail.
5. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application filed by the accused-petitioner is dismissed.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /198