Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18765 (DEL)

HIMANSHU TYAGI v. SANGEETA SAHU

CONT.CAS(C)/1746/2026 · 2026-09-21

Neena Bansal Krishna

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~96 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010450312026 + CONT.CAS(C) 1746/2026 HIMANSHU TYAGI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arun Kumar Tiwari, Mr. Deepak Sharma, Mr. Janamejaya Upadhyay, Mr. Saurabh, Ms. Dipasha Gautam, Ms. Spriha Pandey, Mr. Nirmit Sharma, Advs. versus SANGEETA SAHU .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA O R D E R % 21.09.2026 1. Contempt Petition under Sections 2(b), 10, 11 and 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Article 215 of Constitution of India, has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner against Respondent for breach and disobedience of Order dated 22.04.2019 passed in HMA No.561/2019 and Judgment & Decree dated 01.06.2019 passed in HMA No.840/2019 by learned Principal Judge (East), Family Courts, Karkardooma Courts. 2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission to withdraw present Contempt Petition, with liberty to pursue the remedy in accordance with law. 3. Accordingly, Contempt Petition along with pending Applications stands dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty, as prayed for. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. SEPTEMBER 21, 2026/R This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/09/2026 at 10:32:28