Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18762 (DEL)

SHEHNAZ PARVEEN v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.

W.P.(C)/13886/2026 · 2026-09-21

Saurabh Banerjee

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010450762026 + W.P.(C) 13886/2026, CM APPL. 64932/2026 SHEHNAZ PARVEEN .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Rupali Panwar, Adv. (Through VC) versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS......Respondents Through: Mr. Nitin kumar, Adv. for R-1 and 4 Mr. Parminder Singh, SC for MCD, Mr. Aryanshu Vaibhav Gautam, Adv. for R-2 and 3 Mr. Shoumendu Mukherji SPC, Mr. Vikrant Malwal, GP with Ms Megha Sharma Mr Aniruddha Ghosh Ms Kaberi Sharma, Advs. for R5 with SI Akashdeep PS Jamia Nagar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE O R D E R % 21.09.2026 1. By virtue of the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs: “a. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, including a writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the Respondent Authorities to take immediate and effective action upon the grievance of the Petitioner regarding the illegal, unauthorized and unsafe construction being carried out at This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/09/2026 at 11:14:44 property bearing No. M-21/10/A, Batla House, Jamia Nagar, Near Khalilullah Masjid, New Delhi-110 025; b. Direct the Respondent Authorities to verify compliance with the applicable MCD Building Bye-Laws, structural safety requirements, earthquake-related safety norms and fire-safety requirements, including the proposed installation of a lift at the subject property; c. Direct the Respondent Authorities that, in the event any construction is found to be illegal, unauthorized or in violation of the applicable laws, rules or bye-laws, appropriate action, including stoppage and removal/demolition of the unauthorized construction, be taken against the concerned persons strictly in accordance with law;” 2. After some arguments, learned counsel for petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh with better particulars in accordance with law, if, as and when required. 3. As such, the present petition, alongwith pending application, is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. SAURABH BANERJEE, J SEPTEMBER 21, 2026/Ab This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/09/2026 at 11:14:44