Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18760 (BOM)

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5 MUMBAI v. ACE PROPERTY DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED AY 09 10 ITA 1827 MUM 2023

IA/3161/2024 · 2026-10-09

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

301_IA_3161_2024.DOC Shivgan IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3161 OF 2024 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL(L) NO.29337 OF 2024 Pr Commissioner of Income Tax 5 Mumbai ...Applicant Versus Ace Property Developers Private Limited AY 09 10 ...Respondent _______ Mr Vikas T Khanchandani, for Applicant. Ms Pranaya Ramesh, i/b Rutuja Pawar, for Respondent. _______ CORAM: G. S. KULKARNI & DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ. DATE: 09th OCTOBER 2026 P.C. 1. By this Interim Application, the applicant/appellant has prayed for condonation of delay of 55 days in filing the aforesaid Appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. There is no opposition on behalf of the Respondent-Assessee to this Interim Application. 3. We have perused the averments made in the application. Considering the period of delay and the settled principles of law governing applications for condonation of delay, in our opinion, it is appropriate that the delay is condoned. 4. The Application is accordingly allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). SHAMBHAVI NILESH SHIVGAN Digitally signed by SHAMBHAVI NILESH SHIVGAN Date: 2026.10.14 10:54:20 +0530 301_IA_3161_2024.DOC 5. Office objections, if any, be removed within a period of eight weeks from today. 6. List the Appeal for admission after the removal of office objections. 7. Interim Application stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. No costs. (DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)