2026:HHC:35421 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.14314 of 2026 Date of decision: 20.08.2026. __________________________________________________________ M/s Dhingra Brothers (India) ....Petitioner Versus Union of India & Another ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner : Dr. Rajesh Kumar Parmar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Balram Shuarma, Deputy Solicitor General of India [Senior Advocate] with Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Vijay Kumar Arora, Senior Advocate with Mr. Hitansh Raj and Mr. Ankit Chauhan, Advocates for respondent No.2. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as there is some technical error in the petition which may lead to the rejection of same, the petitioner may be allowed to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:35421 Accordingly, the petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge (Ranjan Sharma) Judge August 20, 2026 [Shivender]