{1} 27-wp-13405-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 27 WRIT PETITION NO. 13405 OF 2026 Joyti Arjun Bhalerao VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others ... Mr. Paresh B. Patil (Borse), Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. S.R. Wakle, AGP for State ....... CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 07th OCTOBER, 2026 PER COURT : . This petition is filed for following main reliefs : “B. By a Writ of Mandamus or any other kind of appropriate Writ like nature the Resp. No. 2 Deputy Director of Education Nashik may kindly be directed as per Shalarht proposal dated 30/11/2022 to include name of the petitioner in Shalarth Pranali forthwith and further the Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 be directed to release the arrears of the salary of the petitioner within a period of four weeks from the date of her appointment w.e.f. 01/08/2022 till today; C. By Writ of Mandamus or any other kind of appropriate Writ like nature the Resp. No. 3 Education Officer (Secondary) Zilha Parishad Jalgaon and Resp. Nos. 4 may kindly be directed to accept the salary bills under the signature of the Resp. No. 5 and sanctioned and release salary and arrears of salary within a period of four weeks by offline process till the name of the petitioner is included in the “Shalarth Pranali.” 2026:BHC-AUG:47564-DB {2} 27-wp-13405-2026 2. The issue raised in this petition and the prayers made therein, are squarely covered by the several orders passed by this Court at the Principal Seat as well as at this Bench. The copies of orders already passed in similar matters are placed on record by the petitioner, including the order passed by this Bench in the case of Mahesh Pralhad Hawa vs. The State of Maharashtra and others in Writ Petition No. 13020 of 2023, as well as the order passed at the Principal Seat in the cases of Aparna Vikas Thakur and Another. Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Others in Writ Petition Nos. 3141 of 2021 and Vandana Govind Kale vs. The State of Maharashtra through its Secretary in Writ Petition No. 7745 of 2021. 3. Since Respondent No. 5/Headmaster has already forwarded proposal of the petitioner for inclusion of her name in Shalarth Pranali on 30.11.2022, no notice is required to be issued. 4. For the reasons stated in the said orders, the Writ Petition is allowed in terms of prayer clauses ‘B’ and ‘C’. (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) Bhagyawant Punde