APHC010121852026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 6646/2026 Between: 1. BHEEMIREDDY GOPALA KRISHNA,, S/O SIVA REDDY, AGE 42 YEARS. RESIDENT OF REDDIGUDEM VILLAGE, REDDIGUDEM MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT - 521215. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYATH RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522238. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, , NTR DISTRICT, VIJAYAWADA - 520002. 3. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, , NTR DISTRICT, VIJAYAWADA - 520002. 4. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, , REDDIGUDEM VILLAGE PANCHAYAT, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT - 521215. 5. PYDIMARLA KRISHNA REDDY, S/O KOTI REDDY, CULTIVATION, AGE 65 YEARS, RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 586, REDDIGUDEM VILLAGE REDDIGUDEM MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT - 521215. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be p. 2 pleased to issue a Writ or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring in action of the 4th Respondent, on the petitioners representation dated 24.02.2026, a complaint against the unauthorized construction by the 5th respondent, without obtaining any permission from the authorities, to the vacant site to an extent of Ac. 0.06 cents. situated in R.S No. 403/16, Reddidguem Village, Reddigudem Mandal, NTR District which is arbitrary, unlawful, against the principles of natural justice and violation of Article 14 and 300A of Constitution of India and consequently, to direct the 4th respondent to take necessary action for the removal of unauthorized construction and Pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the 4th respondent to consider the petitioners representation dated 24.02.2026, regarding the unauthorized construction, till pending disposal of the writ petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BANKA NAGESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: The above writ petition was filed to declare the action of respondent No.4 in not considering the representation dated 24.02.2026, made by the petitioner regarding the construction made by respondent No.5, without obtaining permission, as illegal and arbitrary. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, Sri Chaitanya, learned counsel representing Sri Y. Koteswara Rao, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No.4 submitted the written instructions of p. 3 the Panchayat Secretary. Along with the instructions, a copy of the permission granted to respondent No.5 vide R.C.No.08/BP/2022/RDG/2025, dated 29.11.2025, was annexed, whereby granting permission to respondent No.5 to construct the ground and 1st floor in Sy.No.403/16 of Reddygudem Village and Mandal, NTR District. 3. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition. 4. Permission is accorded. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date : 10.03.2026 TVN p. 4 18 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.6646 OF 2026 Date : 10.03.2026 TVN