HARISH JASUJA SON OF SHRI KASHMIRI LAL JASUJA v. KUNDAN LAL S/O ISHAR DASS
CW/14920/2024 · 2026-01-09
Maneesh Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18744 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18744 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14920/2024 Harish Jasuja Son Of Shri Kashmiri Lal Jasuja, Aged About 48 Years, Resident Of Rl-12, Riddhi Siddhi Colony, Sri-Ganganagar- 335001, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. Kundan Lal S/o Ishar Dass, R/o 173, Surjeet Singh Colony, Gali No. 1 Sri- Ganganagar-335001 Rajasthan
2. Rajender Wadhwa Son Of Jagdish Chand Wadhwa, C/o Surendra Kumar Narang (Firm Jhangi Rma Desh Rajasthan) Anaj Mandi Kesrisinghpur, District Sri- Ganganagar-335001, Rajasthan.
3. M/s Mng Dreams, Last Registered Office 70 H Block, Pragati Tower, Sri Ganganagar-335001, Now Dissolved
4. Jasuja Builders, Through Proprietor Shri Harish Jasuja Last Registered Office Shop No. 9, Lakkar Mandi Sri Ganganagar- 335001, (Now Not In Existence)
5. Anami Buildmart, Through Proprietor Shri Rajender Wadhwa, Address 2-B 25, Sukhadia Nagar, Sri Ganganagar-335001 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nirmal Kumar Goyal For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Order 09/01/2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an appeal (No.118/2022) was preferred by the petitioner against the order dated 09.05.2022 passed by learned Chairman, Rajasthan Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Jaipur in case No.Raj/RERA/C/2019-
2818. Learned counsel further submits that the appeal was
(2 of 3) [CW-14920/2024] preferred in the year 2022 and more than three years have passed since then, but still no decision has been taken on the appeal filed by the petitioner.
2. Relying upon the sub-section 5 of Section 44 of the Rajasthan Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (for short, ‘the Act of 2016’), learned counsel submits that any appeal preferred under sub-section (1), shall be dealt with as expeditiously as possible, and an endeavour shall be made to dispose of the appeal within a period of sixty days from the date of filing of the appeal.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in identical writ petitions bearing S.B. Civil Writ Petitions No.14891/2024, 14897/2024 and 12336/2024, a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide its orders dated 27.09.2024 and 01.08.2024 respectively, was pleased to give direction for expeditious disposal of the appeal, and additionally the effect and operation of the order dated 09.05.2022 passed by the Chairman, Rajasthan Real Estate Regulatory Authority, was stayed till the disposal of the appeal.
4. In view of above, learned counsel for the petitioner makes a limited prayer that the appellate authority i.e. Rajasthan Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur through its Registrar, may kindly be directed to decide the Appeal No.118/2022 at the earliest. He further submits that in the meantime, the order under appeal dated 09.05.2022 may kindly be stayed.
5. Heard.
6. Looking to the similar orders passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court and considering the limited prayer made by
learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the mandate of sub-
(3 of 3) [CW-14920/2024] section 5 of Section 44 of the Act of 2016, the Rajasthan Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur through its Registrar is directed to decide the Appeal No.118/2022 preferred by the petitioner pending before it by a speaking and reasoned order strictly in accordance with law, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
6. Further, till the disposal of the Appeal No.118/2022, the effect and operation of the order dated 09.05.2022 passed by Chairman, Rajasthan Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Jaipur shall remain stayed.
7. Accordingly, the instant writ petition as well as stay application stand disposed of. All other pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(MANEESH SHARMA),J KuD/16