2026:JHHC:19389 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(L) No. 5212 of 2021 M/s V-2 Retail, through its Authorized Signatory, Mukesh Kumar, Store Manager of V2 Retail Limited, aged about 38 years, Son of Viny Kumar, Resident of Bhumihar Toli, Ranchi, P.O.- G.P.O., P.S. – Kotwali, Dist.- Ranchi. … … Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. Assistant Labour Commissioner-cum Authority, (under Minimum Wages Act, 1948), Jamshedpur, P.O. & P.S. – Jamshedpur, Dist.- East Singhbhum. 3.Labour Superintendent-cum-Inspector, (under Minimum Wages Act, 1948), Jamshedpur, P.O. & P.S. – Jamshedpur, Dist.- East Singhbhum. 4.Rakesh Kumar, S/o- Madhu Sudhan. 5.Manish Chaki, S/ o – Rajendra Chaki. 6.Bhudev Mahato, S/ o – Bholanath Mahato. 7.Suraj Kumar Singh, S/ o – Surender Prasad Singh. 8.Rajesh Kumar Seth, S/ o – Kanhaiya Lal Seth. 9.Bishwanath Bosa, S/ o – Ashok Bosa. 10.Jema Pingua, D/o- Chamru Pingua. 11.Pinki Bankira, D/o- Mora Bnkira. 12.Digamber Thakur, S/o- Bacchu Thakur. 13.Tapas Pal, S/ o – Shri Subodh Pal. 14.Santosh Kumar, S/ o – Amerika Thakur Pandria. 15.Suman Kumar, S/ o – Braj Mohan Gupta. 16.Nitesh Mukhi, S/ o – Raju Mukhi. 17.Vijay Sah, S/ o – Ramchandra Sah. 18.Rohit Kumar, S/ o – B. Singh 19.Atikur Rahman, S/ o – Abdul Rahman 20.Tarun Balmuchu, S/ o – Pradhan Balmuchu 21.Shashi Bhusan Singh, S/ o – Jay Prakash Singh 22. Rakesh Bara, S/ o – Sunil Bara 23. Santosh Sahis, S/ o -Motilal Sahis 24.Narayan Gope, S/ o -Balmali Gope … … Respondents --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate For the Resp.-State : Ms. Varsha Ramsisaria, AC to GP-V --- 27/02.07.2026 Learned counsels for the parties are present. 2. This writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs: “For issuance of an appropriate writ(s), order(s), direction(s) or a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the ex-parte order 2026:JHHC:19389 2 dated 25.02.2021 contained in Memo No. 630 dated 01.03.2021 passed by Respondent no. 2 whereby and whereunder the petitioner herein directed to pay the private respondents 5 times compensation along with basic dues labour charge which have been given in column 3 and total given in column 5 which is altogether to the tune of Rs. 6,62,436/- in the bank account of private respondents which is absolutely illegal, arbitrary, whimsical and against the provision of law and also the said ex- parte order is fit to be quashed. And/Or For issuance of any other appropriate Writ(s)/order(s)/ direction(s) as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of this case.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, under the instructions of the client, seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent-State has no objection to the prayer for withdrawal. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 6. Pending interlocutory application, if any, is dismissed as not pressed. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order: 02.07.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading: 03.07.2026