Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18740 (DEL)

ASKAR MICRONS P LTD v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

CONT.CAS(C)/1694/2026 · 2026-09-15

Mini Pushkarna

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~91 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010437002026 + CONT.CAS(C) 1694/2026 & CM APPL. 62845/2026 ASKAR MICRONS P LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Digvijay, Mr. Ramakant Kashyap and Ms. Anjali Nehra, Advs. Mob: 9810843819 Email: siyaram922@gmail.com versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Akhil Mittal, SPC for UOI with Ms. Shayna Das Pattanayak and Ms. Riddhi Jain, Advs. Mob: 921250999 Email: mittalsolicitors@gmail.com Mr. Ravi Mittal, GP Mob: 9711563300 Email: ravimittal1995@gmail.com CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA O R D E R % 15.09.2026 1. The present petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 11th May, 2026, passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) 6372/2026, wherein, directions were issued in the following manner: “xxx xxx xxx This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/09/2026 at 11:02:06 xxx xxx xxx” 2. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel appearing for the respondents, who submits that the speaking order, in terms of the aforesaid directions given by the Division Bench, has already been passed. 3. He draws the attention of this Court to Annexure P-7, appended to the present petition, which is the Standing Order dated 05th June, 2026, issued by the Deputy Commissioner, Northern Railways Headquarter. 4. At this stage, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the purported Standing Order passed by the respondents does not address the issue raised by the petitioner in its representation dated 12th March, 2026. 5. Considering the submissions made before this Court, it is apparent that pursuant to the directions dated 11th May, 2026, the respondents have already passed a Speaking Order. 6. In case, the petitioner is aggrieved by the said Speaking Order, the petitioner is at liberty to seek remedies, in accordance with law. 7. No further orders are required to be passed in the present petition. 8. Accordingly, the present petition, along with pending application is disposed of. MINI PUSHKARNA, J SEPTEMBER 15, 2026/SK This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/09/2026 at 11:02:06