1 2026:CGHC:4704 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 13964 of 2025 1 - Haridas Manikpuri S/o Mohandas Manikpuri Aged About 53 Years Occupation- Teacher, Government Middle School Bela Block Division Korba, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Public Instruction Directorate Chhattisgarh First Floor, C-Block Indiravati Bhavan, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Joint Director Education Department Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Collector And Chairman District Rationalization Committee Korba, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 5 - Sub- Divisional Magistrate (Revenue) Korba, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 6 - District Education Officer Korba, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 7 - Block Education Officer Korba, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 8 - Divya Sahu Teacher Middle School Bela, Block Division Korba, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Awadh Tripathi, Advocate For Respondents-State : Ms. Anuja Sharma, Dy. G.A. 2 SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 28 /01/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and quash the impugned order dated 25.11.2025 (Annexure P/1), in the interest of justice. 10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to post the petitioner at his present place of posting i.e. Middle School Bela Block Korba and strict action may be taken against the respondent authorities for wrongly declaring the petitioner as surplus teacher and for rejected the representation of the petitioner in a discriminatory manner. 10.3 That any other relief which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper may also kindly be granted to the petitioner in the interest of justice along with cost of the petition.” 2. Learned counsel for the Respondent/State raises an objection with regard to maintainability of the writ petition on the ground that the petitioner is having the alternate efficacious remedy of appeal before the Joint Director against the impugned order dated 25.11.2025 (Annexure P/1). 3. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition at this stage with liberty to avail the other remedy available under the law. 4. On due consideration of the submission of counsel for the respective parties, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn at this stage, reserving liberty with the petitioner to avail the alternate remedy available under the law. 5. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY Date: 2026.01.29 11:30:32 +0530