GANESH VIRJI RABARI AND ANR v. SHANTARAM K BHUYAL AND ORS
WP/9719/2026 · 2026-07-31
Shri Arun R Pedneker
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1874 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1874 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Gitalaxmi 903-WP-9719-2026.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9719 OF 2026 MR. GANESH VIRJI RABARI AND OTHERS ...PETITIONERS Versus SHRI. SHANTARAM K. BHUYAL AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS Mr. A. R. Gole, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. A. Y. Sakhare, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Prabhakar M. Jadhav & Mr. Veerdhaval P. Kakade, Advocates for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. Y. D. Patil, AGP for the State-Respondent.
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 31st JULY, 2026. Per Court :
1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
31st JULY, 2026
Gitalaxmi 903-WP-9719-2026.docx
2.
Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners submits that this Writ Petition has been moved since the Appeal was not being entertained. Learned counsel submits that now the Sub-Divisional Officer has taken up the Appeal and proceeded to pass some order.
3. Considering the same, nothing would survive in the present Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of with liberty to the parties to take such appropriate remedies that may be available in law.
[ ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.] 31st JULY, 2026 GITALAXMI KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR Digitally signed by GITALAXMI KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR Date: 2026.08.03 19:37:52 +0530