Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18739 (PAT)

Allen Fidelis v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./38635/2026 · 2026-06-17

Sandeep Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38635 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-283 Year-2026 Thana- SAHARSA SADAR District- Saharsa ====================================================== Allen Fidelis Son of Juliyan Fidelis @ Julias Fedelis Resident of Village/Mohalla- Hatiya Gachhi, Ward No. 29, P.S.- Sahrsa, District- Sahrsa. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Dr. Vijay Shanker Son of Late Bhola Sah R/o- Satsang Mandir, Gandhipath Ward No. 39, P.S.- Saharsa Sadar, District- Saharsa Sadar, At present Director of Surya Hospital. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Satish Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Jai Narain Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 17-06-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No. 283 of 2026 registered for the offence under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 238, 3(5) of the BNS. 3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner, who was an accountant in the hospital along with the co-accused, is alleged to have defalcated Rs. 70-80 lakhs. On being asked about the said occurrence, the petitioner and the co-accused have returned approx Rs. 485000/-. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and the petitioner is not involved in the alleged crime. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38635 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026 2/2 5. During investigation, materials have come in support of the fact that the petitioner and the co-accused have defalcated Rs. 70-80 lakhs and have utilized the same. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed. Vikas/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U