[2026:RJ-JP:4681] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 874/2024 1. Suman Devi W/o Sh. Sunil Kumar, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Shosinghpura, Tehsil Surajgarh, District Jhunjhunu. 2. Sunita W/o Sh. Yogesh, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Raghuveerpura (Godha Ka Bass) Tehsil Surajgarh District Jhunjhunu. 3. Annu W/o Sh. Suresh Kumar, R/o Post Malogaon, Village Ghumansar Khurd Bagar District Jhunjhunu. 4. Jagwanti W/o Late Sh. Sanjay Kumar, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Pipali Tehsil Surajgarh District Jhunjhunu. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Dr. Smt. Shubhra Singh, Dr. Smt Shubhra Singh, Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. Dr Arun Garg Additional Mission Director, National Health Mission Rajasthan Jaipur. 4. Mr Mahipal Singh Project Director, Nhm Jaipur Rajasthan. 5. Dr. O.p. Thakan Director(Sihfw), Medical And Health Services, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 6. The Union Of India, Through Secretary, Ministry Of H.r.d New Delhi. 7. Rajasthan Nursinc Council, Through Its Registrar. 8. Jamiya Urdu, Aligarh, Through Its Registrar, Jamiya Urdu Road, Dodpur, P.o. Aligarh(U.p.) 9. Suman Kumari D/o Mahabir Singh, W/o Sh. Charan Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Gordhanpura Post Tatija Tehsil Khetri District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 10. Beena Kanwar D/o Ladhu Singh, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Ward No. 4, Behind Of Diet, Sainik Nagar, Jhunjhunu, (Raj.). ----Respondents [2026:RJ-JP:4681] (2 of 2) [CCP-874/2024] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Satish Kumar Balwada For Respondent(s) : Mr. Yash Joshi Ms. Tawisha Pant for Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 02/02/2026 It is informed by learned counsel for the respondent that the said impugned is no more in existence, as the Division Bench vide order dated 30.01.2026, set aside the order passed by the SB. Learned counsel for the petitioner do not controvert the fact. Accordingly, the present civil contempt petition stands disposed of. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu /16