JASMEEN KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/5702/2026 · 2026-05-14
Manisha Batra
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18735 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18735 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-5702 IN THE (148)
JASMEEN K STATE OF P
CORAM: Present:
MANISHA B
1.
Constitution o the official res petitioners at t representation
2.
they are maj relationship an parents and re living with th liberty, they se 5702-2026 (O&M)
(1) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH
Da EN KAUR AND ANOTHER Versus OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MA
Ms. Kirti Hooda, Advocate for Mr. R.S. Pathania, Advocate for t Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior D **** HA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been fil tion of India seeking issuance of a w ial respondents No.2 and 3 to protec at the hands of respondents No.4 tation dated 04.05.2026 (Annexure P It is submitted by the learned cou e major. They are in love. Their hip and threats have even been extend and relatives to kill her. She has left ith the petitioner No.2. Apprehendin they sent representation dated 04.05.20
JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CRWP-5702-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 14.05.2026 ... Petitioners
...Respondents E MANISHA BATRA te for the petitioners nior DAG, Punjab een filed under Article 226 of the of a writ of mandamus directing protect the life and liberty of the 4 to 6 and take action on their ure P-3). ed counsel for the petitioners that Their parents are against their extended to petitioner No.1 by her as left her house and has started hending danger to their lives and .2026 to the respondent No.2 AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.14 18:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.
CRWP-5702 but the same h petition.
3.
4.
behalf of respo
directed to sup
5.
learned State their relationsh the veracity of the sanctity o
disposed of wi of Police, Ho representation and also to tak the petitioners
6.
the petitioners them. 14.05.2026 Amit Sharma 5702-2026 (O&M)
(2) same has not been taken into consider Notice of motion. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. DAG f respondents No.1 to 3, at this stage. to supply the copy of the petition to he I have heard learned counsel fo State counsel and without going into ationship as well as without entering u city of the averments made in the peti ctity of relationship or age of the of with a direction to the respondent Hoshiarpur to look into the m tation dated 04.05.2026 (Annexure P to take necessary step, if any, genuine ioners is found. It is made clear that this order s ioners from legal action for violation o
Whether speaking/reasoned:
Whether reportable:- Yes/No
nsideration and hence, the present r. DAG, Punjab accepts notice on stage. The petitioners’ counsel is n to her. sel for the petitioners as well as g into the question of legality of ering upon an exercise to evaluate he petition and also with regard to f the petitioners, this petition is ndent No.2-Senior Superintendent the matter and dispose of the ure P-3) in accordance with law enuine threat to life and liberty of rder shall not be taken to protect tion of law, if any, committed by (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE ned:- Yes/No AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.14 18:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.