Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18735 (AP)

NOORI NAGABHUSHANAM v. Sri Y.V.Anuradha IAS

CC/419/2018 · 2026-03-04

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010125342018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 419/2018 Between: 1. NOORI NAGABHUSHANAM, OCC- ARCHAKA, R/O.CHARNALLAMUDI VILLAGE, VATTICHERUKURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI Y V ANURADHA IAS, THE COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA RURAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. SRI M V SURESH BABU, THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, OPP. GUNTA GROUND, KOTHAPET, GUNTUR CITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SRI K SRINIVASA RAO, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, OPP. GUNTAGROUND, KOTHAPET, GUNTUR CITY, GUNTUR DISTICT. . 4. SRI P V SUBBA RAO, EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRI GANGA PARVATHI SAMETHA CHENDRASEKHARA SWAMY TEMPLE, CHAMALLAMUDI VILLAGE, VATTICHERUKURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents No.1 to 4/Respondents No.2 to 5 herein for willful disobeying committing the contempt of Order extending interim order until further orders DT-08-04-2017 in WPMP No.50018 of 2014 in WP No.39887 of 2014 passed by the Hon'ble Justice Sri Justice A.Rajasekhar Reddy Garu in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NAGARAJU NAGURU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. P RAJANI REDDY 2. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP) 3. ELEVATED AS JUDGE The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO:419 OF 2018 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 08.04.2017 in I.A. No.1 of 2014 in W.P.No.39887 of 2014. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and learned counsel for the respondents. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that since the writ petition itself is dismissed as non- prosecution, no further orders are necessary and the present contempt case cannot be enforced. Hence, requested to close the contempt case. 4. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 05.03.2026 BSP 31 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA (closed) Contempt Case No.419 of 2018 05.03.2026 BSP