[2026:RJ-JP:2480] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13875/2025 Vinod Kumar Agarwal, aged about 48 Years, S/o Shri Rameshwar Lal Agarwal, R/o 213, Swami Vihar, T.N. Mishra Marg, Nirman Nagar, Ajmer Road, Jaipur - 302019 (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Rajasthan through its Chairman, having registered office at 2nd & 3rd Floor, RSIC Building, Udyog Bhavan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur-302005 2. Jaipur Development Authority through its Secretary, having registered office at Indra Circle, Jawaharlal Nehru Marg, Jaipur-302004 3. Jaipur Metro Rail Corporation Limited through its Chairman & Managing Director, having registered office at Admin Building, Metro Depot, Bhrigu Path, Mansarovar, Jaipur-302020 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Priyanshi Katta For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 20/01/2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "It is therefore, most humbly and respectfully prayed that Your Lordships may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and by an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof: 1. Issue an appropriate order, or direction to the Respondent No.1 to decide the pending execution application No.RAJ-RERA- EXAPP-2024-5 expeditiously in accordance with the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rahul S. Shah v. Jinendra Ku- mar Gandhi reported in 2021 6 SCC 418; 2. Any orther order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case in favour of the petitioner." [2026:RJ-JP:2480] (2 of 2) [CW-13875/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite the complaint No. RAJ-RERA-C-2020-3622 (Annexure-1) filed by the petitioner being allowed vide order dated 22.09.2020, and additionally the appeal against the same order being dismissed on 07.10.2025, the execution proceedings filed before the RERA Authority have not been decided yet. In order to buttress her argument, she places reliance upon the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Rahul Shah vs. Jinendra Kumar Gandhi & Ors.1. 3. Heard and considered the submissions made at bar. 4. In view of the fact that the original complaint was allowed vide order dated 22.09.2020, appeal against the same was dismissed vide order dated 07.10.2025, there is no stay operating against the execution of the order dated 22.09.2020, and the execution application has been pending since 15.07.2024. 5. Therefore, while considering the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Rahul Shah (Supra), the Executing Court is directed to dispose of the Execution Proceedings within a period of 6 months from the date of filing of the certified copy of this order, which may be extended only by recording reasons in writing for such delay. 6. In that view of the matter, the present writ petition is disposed of. 7. Other pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of, accordingly. (MANEESH SHARMA),J DEEPA-56 1 2021 6 SCC 418