- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26187 W.P. No.8548/2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.8548/2023 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SHIVANNACHAR S/O LATE LAKKAPPACHAR AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/AT. SHAKUNI THIMMANAHALLI HOLAVANAHALLI HOBLI KORATAGERE TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 121. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VENKATESH K.N. ADV., [ABSENT]) AND: 1. VENKATARAMAIAH S/O LATE THIMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS R/AT BUDAIHNAPALYA 1ST CROSS, GOKULADAS BADAVANE NEAR RATION DEPOT BATAWADE, TUMKURU-572 103. 2. RANGASHAMAIAH S/O BANADA RANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT SHAKUNI THIMMANAHALLI HOLAVANAHALLI HOBLI KORATAGERE TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 121. Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26187 W.P. No.8548/2023 3. NAGARAJU S/O LATE KARIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/AT SHAKUNI THIMMANAHALLI HOLAVANAHALLI HOBLI KORATAGERE TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 121. 4. RANGAIAH S/O DODDA THIMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT KALLIPALYA HOLAVANAHALLI HOBLI KORATAGERE TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 121. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VIJAY KRISHNA BHAT M, ADV., FOR C/R1) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SETTING ASIDE THE FINAL ORDER PASSED BY THE HON'BLE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KORATAGERE ON IA NO.1 IN OS NO. 40/2022 ON 09.06.2022. SETTING ASIDE THE FINAL ORDER PASSED BY THE HON'BLE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KORATAGERE IN MA NO.17/2022 ON 02.03.2023. ALLOWING THE IA NO. 1 FILED BY THE PETITIONER U/O 39 RULES 1 AND 2 OF CPC IN OS NO. 40/2022 IN THE COURT OF THE HON'BLE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KORATAGERE, THEREBY RESTRAINING THE RESPONDENTS NO. 1 TO 4 FROM INTERFERING WITH THE PETITIONER'S PEACEFUL POSSESSION AND ENJOYMENT OVER THE SUIT SCHEDULE PROPERTY MENTIONED IN THE PLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN OS NO. 40/2022 & ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26187 W.P. No.8548/2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner when the matter is called in the morning session as well as in the afternoon session. 2. Memo of retirement is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner is not accompanied with the notice for having served the petitioner. 3. Office objections are not complied with since 2023 till this day. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE BSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6