DEEPAK SARAN S/O SH. GHEESALAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/11709/2025 · 2026-01-09
Ganesh Ram Meena
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18731 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18731 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:887] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11709/2025 Deepak Saran S/o Sh. Gheesalal, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Mund K Dhani, Akouda, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Soniya Saini for Mr. Majhar Hussain For Complainant(s) For State : : Mr. Arafat Hussain Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, Addl.G.A. cum P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 09/01/2026
1. Petitioner has filed this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.751/2024 registered with the Police Station, Mansarovar, District Jaipur City (South) for offence under Sections 110, 189(2) & 324(5) of B.N.S., 2023.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties have entered into compromise.
3.
Learned counsel for the complainant also verifies the fact of compromise in between the parties.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the anticipatory bail application.
[2026:RJ-JP:887] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-11709/2025]
5. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and so also the fact that the parties have entered into a compromise, this Court deems just and proper to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed. The S.H.O./I.O./Arresting Authority, Police Station Mansarovar, District Jaipur City (South) in F.I.R. No. 751/2024 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- (I). that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii). that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer, and (iii). that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /253