Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1873 (AP)

N. SANTHAMMA v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/6456/2026 · 2026-04-05

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010119042026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 6456/2026 Between: 1. N. SANTHAMMA, W/O. LATE SRI N. SUBRAHMANYAM, AGED 55 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O.D.NO.1-1421, 1ST LINE, PONUGUPATI COLONY, ONGOLE TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE ONGOLE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, ONGOLE TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE OFFICER, ONGOLE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ONGOLE TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ANANDA KUMAR VEJANDLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP 2 The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Sri Vital Kumar, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Vejandla Ananda Kumar, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, on instructions, seeks to withdraw this Writ Petition. 2. Request granted. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. 4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:06.04.2026 Vns