Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-5987-20 IN THE H (146) SALONI AND A STATE OF PUN
CORAM: HON
Present: Mr.
Ms. *** MANISHA BAT
1.
The Constitution of In official responde petitioners at the representation da
2.
It is they are major. T and threats have relatives to kill h petitioner No.2. representation da not been taken in 2026 (O&M)
(1) HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AN CHANDIGARH
CR
Dat AND ANOTHER
Versus F PUNJAB AND OTHERS
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANI Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate for Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior DAG *** BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed n of India seeking issuance of a writ o spondents No.2 and 3 to protect th at the hands of respondents No.4 to tion dated 17.05.2026 (Annexure P-4 It is submitted by the learned coun ajor. They are in love. Their parents ar have even been extended to petitione kill her. She has left her house and No.2. Apprehending danger to their l tion dated 17.05.2026 to the responde ken into consideration and hence, the p
AB AND HARYANA AT
CRWP-5987-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 20.05.2026
... Petitioners
...Respondents MANISHA BATRA te for the petitioners or DAG, Punjab n filed under Article 226 of the writ of mandamus directing the tect the life and liberty of the to 9 and take action on their 4). d counsel for the petitioners that ents are against their relationship titioner No.1 by her parents and e and has started living with the their lives and liberty, they sent spondent No.2 but the same has e, the present petition.
AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.20 16:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.
CRWP-5987-20
3.
Noti
4.
Ms behalf of respon
directed to supply
5.
I ha learned State co their relationship the veracity of th the sanctity of rel of with a direc Amritsar to look 17.05.2026 (Ann necessary step, if found.
6.
It is petitioners from them. 20.05.2026 Amit Sharma
2026 (O&M)
(2) Notice of motion. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. DAG, espondents No.1 to 3, at this stage. T supply the copy of the petition to her. I have heard learned counsel for ate counsel and without going into t onship as well as without entering up y of the averments made in the petitio y of relationship or age of the petitione direction to the respondent No.2 o look into the matter and dispose o (Annexure P-4) in accordance wi step, if any, genuine threat to life and It is made clear that this order shall from legal action for violation of l (MA
Whether speaking/reasoned:- Ye
DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on tage. The petitioners’ counsel is to her. el for the petitioners as well as into the question of legality of ing upon an exercise to evaluate petition and also with regard to titioners, this petition is disposed No.2-Commissioner of Police, pose of the representation dated with law and also to take e and liberty of the petitioners is r shall not be taken to protect the of law, if any, committed by (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.20 16:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.