Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18725 (JHR)

MAHENDRA KUMAR RAVIDAS @ MAHENDRA KUMAR DAS v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6089/2026 · 2026-07-02

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:19329] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6089 of 2026 ------ Mahendra Kumar Ravidas @ Mahendra Kumar Das, aged about 28 years, S/O- Tejnath Ravidas, Resident of Village- Kajri, P.O.- Tapin, P.S.- Charhi, District- Hazaribag .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Prabhat Kr. Sinha, Advocate Mr. Mayank Mridul, Advocate For the State : Mr. Achinto Sen, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-02-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Charhi P.S. Case No.20 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 126 (2), 127 (2), 115 (2), 118 (2), 109 (1), 352, 351 (2), 3 (5) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in furtherance of the common intention with the co-accused persons, attempted to commit murder of Mubarak Ansari with sticks and iron rods, causing grievous injury to him. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that the informant party was the aggressor party. It is next submitted that the genesis of the occurrence is land dispute between the parties and in this respect, Title Appeal No.02 of 2022 filed by the informant, has resulted in dismissal. It is next submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 29.04.2026 passed in B.A. No.3528 of 2026. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 05.05.2026 as has been mentioned in para-12 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-1st Class, Hazaribag in connection with Charhi P.S. Case No.20 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-02.07.2026-Animesh/