Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18720 (AP)

SARANAM VENKATA POORNA CHANDER RAO, VIZIANAGARAM v. STATE OF A.P., REP. BY P.P., HYD & 2 OTHRS

CRLRC/2230/2014 · 2026-03-12

Subhendu Samanta

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010125342014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: Between: 1. SARANAM VENKATA POORNA CHANDER RAO, VIZIANAGARAM, S/O VENAKTESWARA RAO, FLAT NO. S APARTMENTS, OPP: TOSHIAVAOLA BHAVAN, NCS ROAD, VIZIANAGARAM 1. STATE OF A P REP 2. VOBBILISETTY SRINIVASA RAO, S/O V.B. RAMANAYYA, R/O 6 ALLAKA STREET, VIZIANAGARAM 3. VENKATA KRISHNA PHARMACEUTICALS, REP. BY SOLE PROP. SRI SARANAM VENKATA POORNA CHANDER RAO S/O VENKATESWARA RAO Revision filed under Section 397/401 of Cr circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Case, the High Court may be pleased to allow the Criminal Revision petition by setting aside the Criminal Appeal No. 20 of 2014 on the file of Judge, Family Court- Cum III Addl. District and Sessions at Vizianagaram dated 07.11.2014 and pass IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2230 OF 2014 SARANAM VENKATA POORNA CHANDER RAO, VIZIANAGARAM, S/O VENAKTESWARA RAO, FLAT NO. S-2, SAI AMRUTHA ROYAL APARTMENTS, OPP: TOSHIAVAOLA BHAVAN, NCS ROAD, ...PETITIONER AND STATE OF A P REP BY P.P., HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH. VOBBILISETTY SRINIVASA RAO, S/O V.B. RAMANAYYA, R/O 6 ALLAKA STREET, VIZIANAGARAM VENKATA KRISHNA PHARMACEUTICALS, REP. BY SOLE PROP. SRI SARANAM VENKATA POORNA CHANDER RAO S/O VENKATESWARA RAO ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Case, the High Court may be pleased to allow the Criminal Revision petition by setting aside the Criminal Appeal No. 20 of 2014 on the file of Judge, Cum III Addl. District and Sessions at Vizianagaram dated IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3560] FRIDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA 2014 SARANAM VENKATA POORNA CHANDER RAO, VIZIANAGARAM, 2, SAI AMRUTHA ROYAL APARTMENTS, OPP: TOSHIAVAOLA BHAVAN, NCS ROAD, ...PETITIONER OF ANDHRA PRADESH. VOBBILISETTY SRINIVASA RAO, S/O V.B. RAMANAYYA, R/O 6-4-13, VENKATA KRISHNA PHARMACEUTICALS, REP. BY SOLE PROP. SRI SARANAM VENKATA POORNA CHANDER RAO S/O ...RESPONDENT(S): C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to allow the Criminal Revision petition by setting aside the Criminal Appeal No. 20 of 2014 on the file of Judge, Cum III Addl. District and Sessions at Vizianagaram dated IA NO: 1 OF 2014(CRLRCMP 3685 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge on bail to the petitioner/appellant pending final disposal of the Criminal Appeal 20 of 2014 on the file of Judge, Family court cum III Addl. District and Sessions at Vizayanagaram and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Y MALATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. TADDI NAGESWARA RAO 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following Order : Mr. Taddi Nageswara Rao, learned counsel for the Respondent No.2 submitted a Memo, dated 27.02.2026, which contains Compromise Agreement. He submits that the Respondent No.2 is bed ridden, because of the fact, it is not possible to appear before this Court personally. Compromise Agreement duly signed by the parties. 2. Mr. P. Gopala Krishna, learned counsel, representing Ms. Y. Malathi, learned counsel for the Petitioner has categorically stated that his client has paid the entire amount and Compromise Agreement was entered into. 3. Considering the entire aspect, as the matter was settled, there is nothing left in this matter to decide. However, the instant Criminal Revision has filed against the order of conviction recorded by learned Trial Court against the present Petitioner. During pendency of instant Criminal Revision, the matter was compromised and the Petitioner has paid the entire agreed sum towards full and final settlement. This fact suggests that the matter is required to be disposed of by taking note of the compounding of the offence. 4. Accordingly, the instant Criminal Revision Case is disposed of. The offence against the present Petitioner under Section 138 of N.I.Act is hereby compounded. The Petitioner is hereby acquitted from the case and sureties are also released. 5. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ SUBHENDU SAMANTA, J Date: 13.03.2026 KK THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2230 OF 2014 13.03.2026 KK