- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25354 WP NO.20886 OF 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 01ST DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.20886 OF 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: SMT. BHAGYAMMA W/O LATE BOMME GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT SEEGEHALLI VILLAGE, K. GOLLALAHALLI GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KENGERI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 062. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GUTHAL SIVAPPA SHANKARAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE TAHSILDAR BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, KANDAYA BHAVANA, BENGALURU - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP) Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25354 WP NO.20886 OF 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.2 TO CONTINUE THE NAME OF BOMME GOWDA, THE HUSBAND OF THE PETITIONER IN THE RTC OF THE LAND BEARING SURVEY NO.3 OF SEEGEHALLI VILLAGE BY CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATIONS GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER DATED 19.03.2021, 24.01.2022, 04.05.2023, 06.02.2024 AND 05.07.2025 VIDE ANNXURES 'K', 'L', 'M', 'N' AND 'P' RESPECTIVELY; AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH ORAL ORDER In this petition, the petitioner has sought for direction to the respondent No.2-Tahsildar to continue the name of Bomme Gowda, husband of the petitioner in the RTC of the land bearing Survey No.3 of Seegehalli Village by considering the representations made by the petitioner dated 19.03.2021, 24.01.2022, 04.05.2023, 06.02.2024 and 05.07.2025 vide Annexure 'K', 'L', 'M', 'N' and 'P' respectively. 2. Heard Sri. Guthal Sivappa Shankarappa, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. Spoorthy Hegde N., learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for respondents. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25354 WP NO.20886 OF 2025 3. Having taken note of the submission made by learned counsel appearing for the parties and on perusal of the averments made in the writ petition, I am of the view that the respondent No.2 shall consider the representations made by the petitioner. Therefore, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the respondent No.2-Tahsildar is directed to consider the representations made by the petitioner dated 19.03.2021, 24.01.2022, 04.05.2023, 06.02.2024 and 05.07.2025 vide Annexure 'K', 'L', 'M', 'N' and 'P' respectively in accordance with law, within an outer limit of four months from the date of receipt of this order. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5